![]() ![]() Then I would delete the virtual copy, and the. When I only had LR, I would export edited images as. I want the option of switching photo editors and keeping my RAW files will allow me to do that! You have just cemented my choice especially now with the NEW LR CC. ![]() I have more confidence that Nikon will be around than LR Classic in twenty years! I had planned to switch to DNG at the beginning of this year but quickly decided it wasn’t for me for precisely the points you made. Obviously a particularly relevant topic as we (LR classic users) face the transition to LR cloud, or switching to a new platform.If you shoot raw and use Lightroom do you import t. įor reference, I have played with DNG, but currently stick with raw. But there's no easy way back to raw (at least, not while preserving the edits you made in the DNG file). You can always move to DNG in the future - Lightroom has a convert feature. So if you go back and tweak some labels, you get a few small files to re-backup, not the whole collection.Į. Keeping the edits in an XMP means that the big files in your backup set don't change when you make edits. You have the best chance of switching to a competing image editor if you have the original raw files, not a DNG that is (for better or worse) connected with Adobe.ĭ. Argument (1) above is false: the DNG is really just an encapsulation of the original raw data, so if some future editing program doesn't support your camera's layout of pixels or Bayer filters, doesn't really matter whether it's in the original raw file, or encapsulated in a DNG, it won't work.Ĭ. What's the chance that Adobe will still support DNG in the future? Even though it's open source, will other image editor vendors support DNG? And if they don't, will you be able to recover the original raw file so you can import into some new program?ī. ![]() Easy validation of a collection (the DNG contains a checksum that Lightroom can validate)Ī. DNG can be a little smaller than raw files.Ĥ. Moving files around the edits always stay with the image.ģ. Single file format, in 20 years time, it's more likely that your favorite image editor will work with today's DNG than today's proprietary raw file from a manufacturer who might not even be in business in 20 years.Ģ. You probably already figured that out though from my settings.īlackmagic's Free Davinci Resolve with whatever LUT's you want to use is getting pretty easy now.If you shoot raw and use Lightroom do you import to DNG, or do you import the raw file unchanged and accept the XMP sidecars that store the edits alongside? (Or do you convert to DNG with the "embed raw" option set?)ġ. With that said, I have broken down and started using LUT's and the like in Postprocessing. Been using Cinelike for my color settings. What I have been using lately is 30 FPS max, +1+1+0 on the sharpness / contrast / saturation settings, 100 ISO with 60 FPS shutter speed, and for white balance I let the machine decide for me and then I loc it in under custom, or I use Sunny or Cloudy default settings. ![]() I haven't fully tested this out yet to find the best settings to get rid of it yet though. When I put the Polar Pro filters on, I get motion blur instead of flicker. I took some video of some rocks and I can see it flicker, but I think it due to high shutter and high ISO. I think it is still there in the higher resolutions, but since the pixels are smaller, it doesn't jump out at you as much. Well, I think I see your flicker issue with high detail settings. Hey pal I remembered you try to avoid lots of post work on vids, mind sharing your settings bud ? Having a hard time getting decent results, think you said 1080p and not above 30fps ? What color settings you use if you don't mind me asking. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |